Sims v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 751 So. 2d 537 - Goodwin v. State · 785 So. 2d 1209 - LaMarca v. State · 745 So. 2d 343 - Rivera v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he admission of improper collateral crime evidence is presumed harmful error because of the danger that a jury will take the bad character or propensity to commit the crime as evidence of guilt of the crime charged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“identification of Kulling as the perpetrator rested on the testimony of a single witness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.