Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

839 So. 2d 916

Rowe v. State

Decided March 14, 2003

Relies on 818 So. 2d 544 - Taylor v. State

Decided 2003-03-14

KELLY, Judge.

¶1Roy Rowe challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Rowe argues that his sentence as a habitual felony offender is illegal based on Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).1 We affirm the decision of the trial court because the statute under which Rowe was sentenced, section 775.084(4)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2001), was not affected by the amendments contained within chapter 99-188. Rowe is therefore not entitled to relief under Taylor.

¶2Affirmed.

SILBERMAN and COVINGTON, JJ., concur.

¶3. Taylorheld that chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida was unconstitutional because it was enacted in violation of the single subject rule.

/839/so2d/916 · .json · Public domain