Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 SW2D 137 - Davis v. HydPro, Inc.

Davis v. HydPro, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2017

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. United States · Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc. · Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. Brady · Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co. · Lowenfield v. Butler, Warden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A necessary element of the plaintiff's cause of action is a showing that the defendant took an active part in persuading a party to a contract to breach it. Merely entering into a contract with a party with the knowledge of that party's contractual obligations to someone else is not the same as inducing a breach. It is necessary that there be some act of interference or of persuading a party to breach, for example by offering better terms or other incentives, for tort liability to arise.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.