Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 S.W.2d 436 - State v. Lock

State v. Lock’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2015

5 state decisions

20199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cuyler v. Adams · Woods v. United States · United States v. Roberts · Crooker v. United States · Commonwealth v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “petition to reconsider.” See State v. Ryan, 756 S.W.2d 284, 285, n. 2 (Tenn.Crim.App.1988) (stating, “there is no provision in the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure for a petition to reconsider' or a 'petition to rehear'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.