State v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Ramsey (1993), Chambers v. Bowersox (1998)
2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Florida v. Jimeno · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · State v. Davis · Jackson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will not permit motion counsel to convert unpreserved error into viable error by arguing incompetence. Defendants may be held to the consequences of counsel’s failure to object, whether the failure is the result of a strategic decision, or is due to inadvertence. The fact that a meritorious objection is not made does not demonstrate incompetence. There must be a showing that counsel’s overall performance fell short of established norms and that this incompetence probably affected the result. Otherwise failure to object constitutes a procedural default, precluding appellate or collateral relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones“facially establishes substantial grounds for believing that manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice has resulted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`Plain error is evident, obvious, and clear error.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DWN
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.