Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 SW2D 749 - Goad v. State

Goad v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Short v. State · Colbert v. State · Batson v. State · Malone v. State · Reeder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As long as there are no inconsistencies between the findings of fact and the actual facts, and the findings and conclusions are sufficiently specific to permit meaningful review, there is no error. When the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law respond to each and every allegation made and when it is clear from the record that the motion court carefully examined each allegation, the verbatim adoption of the state’s proposed findings would be an appropriate option.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.