Crouch v. Truman’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably Day v. Estate of Wiswall (1963), 2 Ariz. App. 607 - Shetter v. Rochelle (1966)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crouch v. Pixler · 49 So. 2d 658 - Courvelle v. Eckart · Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co. · Askins v. Overholser · 11 N.J. Super. 317 - Bayuk v. Feldman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]e find no case where an appellate court will allow a correction of this character after decision on appeal when the alleged record defect was known before such decision. The cases require such proceeding to be taken prior to the time of decision on appeal. Rogers v. Ziller, Miss., 49 So.2d 736 ; Woods v. First National Bank, 9 Cir., 16 F.2d 856 ; Bayuk v. Feldman, 11 N.J.Super. 317 , 78 A.2d 282 .” 84 Ariz. at 363 , 328 P.2d at 616 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to provide a method for presenting [an' appellate] court a true record as a basis for its decision on appeal[,][i]t was not intended that parties with knowledge of a possibly incorrect record could sit by and allow a decision to be made and mandate to go down and thereafter attempt to correct [the] record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Diaz““When a party has full and complete opportunity to develop his case but does not do so and the case is reversed for this reason, the law does not call for a new trial to permit him to do what he should have done in the first trial.” 84 Ariz. 360, 362 , 328 P.2d 614, 615 (1958)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.