George v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · United States v. Lacy · United States v. Rugh · Cummings v. State · Watson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the city of Hot Springs . .. , there is now being concealed certain property, namely: the evidence associated with the producing, directing, or promoting sexual performances and employing or consenting to use of child in sexual performance. Which are[:] evidentiary items in a sexual exploitation investigation and in direct violation of Arkansas state statute, 5-27-402 and 5-27-403. And that the facts tending to establish the foregoing grounds for issuance of a search warrant are as follows: that on 03-22-01, pB.T. ’s mother] reported her fourteen year old daughter, [B.T.], revealed to her Glenn George provided alcohol to her and other friends and that she observed nude photographs of other girls she knows to be age fourteen or fifteen. [B.T.] was interviewed and stated Glenn George gave her an alcoholic beverage to drink and she saw nude photographs on George’s computer of girls she knows to [be] fourteen or fifteen years old. That a friend of [B.T.’s], [J.T.], was also interviewed and stated George provided her with an alcoholic beverage and she found a video on George’s computer of friend, [K.T.], dancing nude.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. George v. State“[A]s to each of the counts that involve these young girls just baring their breasts for the video camera. At least two of them testified that they took them, and there was nothing to show that [appellant] knowingly possessed the items, even if they met the definition of sexual behavior. I don’t think they do, because they don’t qualify as a lewd exhibition. It’s the same sort of flashing behavior you see maybe in New Orleans for the Mardi Gras where they toss jewels and silly things like that. It’s more akin to mooning [than] to lewd behavior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. George v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.