Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 BR 24 - In Re Meo

In Re Meo’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2009

1 federal appellate ·

100198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on In Re Shebel · Werner v. Puente (In Re Puente) · First National Bank of Harrisburg v. Jones (In Re Jones) · Gordon's Jewelry Co. of New Jersey v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein) · Cobb v. Hadley (In Re Hadley)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) On request of the trustee, a creditor, or the United States trustee, and after notice and a hearing, the court shall revoke a discharge granted under subsection (a) of this section if— (1) such discharge was obtained through the fraud of the debtor, and the requesting party did not know of such fraud until after the granting of such discharge; (2) the debtor acquired property that is property of the estate or became entitled to acquire property that would be property of the estate, and knowingly and fraudulently failed to report the acquisition of or entitlement to such property, or to deliver or surrender such property to the trustee; ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when the misconduct is discoverable in time to allow a creditor or the trustee to object to discharge or request an extension of time to do so within the 60 days of the date first set for a meeting of creditors, the bar date of Rule 4004(a) governs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.