Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 BR 878 - Kadel v. Thompson

Kadel v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 1997
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Matter of Wood v. P Wood & Pa · White Motor Credit Citibank Na v. White Motor Corporation · Kinder v. Wisconsin Barge Line, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]on-core proceedings under § 157(b)(2)(B) of title 28 [liquidation of personal injury tort or wrongful death cases], shall not be subject to the mandatory abstention provisions of Section 1334(c)(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.