84 Cal. App. 2d 347 - Andre v. Allynn’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 1978 · most notably 44 Cal. 2d 225 - Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co. (1955), Parker v. Highland Park, Inc. (1978)
3 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anthony v. Hobbie · Neel v. Mannings, Inc. · Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · 103 Cal. App. 531 - White v. Davis · Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Even though appellant’s testimony was susceptible of the one construction that prior to the accident she did observe the unevenness of said platform, which it is claimed constituted the element of danger, there would still be the question for the determination of the jury as to whether or not it was a want of ordinary care on the part of appellant not to have kept in mind such element of danger while arising from the stool and leaving the platform. (Hayward v. Downer, 65 Cal.App. 450 [ 225 P. 265 ] ; Meindersee v. Meyers, 188 Cal. 498 [ 205 P. 1078 ].)’””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.