Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 CALAPP2D 787 - People v. Torres

People v. Torres’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
November 1978
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 1978 · most notably 65 Cal. 2d 349 - Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (1966), 266 Cal. App. 2d 854 - Ishimatsu v. Regents of University of California (1968)

25 state decisions

1201948195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 27 Cal. 2d 478 - People v. Adamson · 15 Cal. 2d 731 - People v. Kynette · People v. Yeager · People v. Montgomery · People v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Those portions thereof which incriminated Torres likewise incriminated and were competent evidence of the guilt of the defendant or defendants making them. Certain portions tended to refute certain testimony of the defense witnesses and it was proper argument to attack the credibility of the latter by directing the attention of the jury to these inconsistencies. Because these admissions were not evidence of the guilt of Torres did not preclude the prosecutor from arguing their full effect within the limits of their competency. There was no suggestion in his argument that any of these admissions be considered by the jury in determining the guilt of Torres.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.