Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 CALAPP3D 224 - People v. Locklar

People v. Locklar’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2002

20 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Swain v. State of Alabama · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Lewis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are aware and we sympathize with trial courts confronted with massive caseloads on the one hand and, on the other hand, the embarrassment of having to send venires home because suddenly there is no case to try. Trial courts must and do have a broad discretion in granting or denying trial continuances, but this discretion may not be exercised in such a manner as to impair fundamental rights of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.