Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 CONNAPP 175 - Schwartz v. Milazzo

Schwartz v. Milazzo’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2024

17 state decisions

90200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Issler v. Issler · Whalen v. Ives · State v. Cook · DeBlasio v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. · State v. Wokoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After a default, a defendant may still contest liability. Practice Book §§ 17-34, 17-35 and 17-37 delineate a defendant's right to contest liability in a hearing in damages after default. Unless the defendant provides the plaintiff written notice of any defenses, the defendant is foreclosed from contesting liability.... If written notice is furnished to the plaintiff, the defendant may offer evidence contradicting any allegation of the complaint and may challenge the right of the plaintiff to maintain the action or prove any matter of defense.... This approximates what the defendant would have been able to do if he had filed an answer and special defenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “notice of defenses must be filed within ten days after notice from the clerk to the defendant that a default has been entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.