Harper v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis
84 F. 222 · 1897
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1912
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. American Bell Telephone Co. · Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Philadelphia & R. R. · Jaros Hygienic Underwear Co. v. Fleece Hygienic Underwear Co. · Bedsole v. . Monroe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A bill seeking to restrain tbe publication of a book, as infringing in its title a trade-mark right, and in its text certain rights secured to them by four copyrights is not multifarious.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bracken v. Rosenthal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.