King v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
84 F.2d 156 · 1936
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1990
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 26 U.S.C. § 161
Relies on Eaton v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Broadway National Bank v. Adams · Lathrop v. Merrill · Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Luke · Huntress v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[pjayments of income hereunder are to be made upon the sole order or receipt of the beneficiary without power of anticipation by voluntary or involuntary assignment or otherwise and free from the control of any creditors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.