United States v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
84 F.2d 449 · 1936
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1952
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tyson v. United States · 4 F. Supp. 175 - Creasy v. United States · United States v. Walker · Weaver v. United States · United States v. Tarrer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Dear Sir: November 11, 1932. “Your claim for payment of insurance on account of permanent and total disability from the date of your discharge from military service has received careful consideration in this office and you are informed that on November 9, 1932, the Insurance Claims Council rendered a decision to the effect that the evidence submitted in connection with your claim is not sufficient to show that you became permanent and total for insurance purposes at the time of your discharge nor at any time subsequent to your discharge. It will, therefore, be impossible for this Administration to make payment of any insurance to you. “If you wish, you may consider this decision as final and in that event the suspension of the statute of limitations as provided in Section 19 of the World War Veterans Act, 1924, as amended, ceases from and after the date this letter reaches your present address. This may be treated as a letter of disagreement if you desire to institute suit in a proper court to recover on your insurance contract on the theory that you did become permanent and total for insurance purposes at a time when you had insurance in force with this Administration. “Your compensation folder will now be decentralized to the Regional Office of this Administration at Louisville, Kentucky. All future correspondence by you in regard to your claim should, therefore, be directed to that office. “Respectfully “(Signed) IT. L. McCoy, “Director of Insurance.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.