Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 F.3d 1047 - Gopher Oil Co. v. Bunker

Gopher Oil Co. v. Bunker’s Empirical Analysis

84 F.3d 1047 · 1996

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Costner v. URS Consultants, Inc. (1998), Trimble v. Asarco, Inc. (2000)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

140199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. · Shannon v. Ford Motor Co. · Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc. v. Reilly · GNB Battery Technologies, Inc. v. Gould, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The mere possibility of being named a defendant as responsible party does not constitute the actual controversy which is required. This Court recognizes that the EPA, and the United States on its behalf, for any number of reasons, may well and yet decline to sue Gopher Oil, or they may select yet another among the ten, or others beyond those listed as potential defendants. They may also defer simply on the fact that this ease is too small or any one of a number of reasons.... In the event they are to be sued, those are [sic] another issue, but this Court at this time cannot find the requisite immediacy, and in this Court’s view there is little hardship to the plaintiff in withholding the Court’s consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'A live dispute must exist between the parties at the time of the court’s hearing.’ ” Id. (quoting Caldwell v. Gurley Ref. Co., 755 F.2d 645, 649 (8th Cir. 1985)). However,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “had not itself incurred response costs and the government had not yet brought a cost-recovery action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.