Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

84 F.3d 1153

Docket Nos. 94-16064, 94-35775.

Pacific Telesis Group v. United States

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP; Pacific Bell; Nevada Bellv.UNITED STATES of America, et al.; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, and California Cable Television Association, Intervenor-Appellee. US WEST, INC.; US West Communications; US West Multimedia Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Washington Independent Telephone Association; Pacific Telecom, Inc
  • (PTI), and its Subsidiaries, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-v.UNITED STATES of America; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

May 24, 1996.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-05-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1996

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Holywell Corp. v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

¶2

Prior report: --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1037, 134 L.Ed.2d 186.

¶3

Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING,* District Judge.

ORDER

¶4

The joint motion of the parties in case no. 94-16064, which was filed with the court on April 29, 1996, is GRANTED. This case is hereby remanded to the district court. The district court order of May 17, 1994, shall be vacated and the case dismissed as moot.

¶5

Case no. 94-35775 is hereby remanded to the district court. The district court shall vacate its order granting summary judgment and the case shall be dismissed as moot.

*

The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

/84/f3d/1153 · .json · Public domain