Bagdadi v. Nazar’s Empirical Analysis
84 F.3d 1194 · 1996
Citation profile
359 federal appellate · 53 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 571 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Bradley v. Harcourt, Brace & Co. (1996), Freeman v. Arpaio (1997)
359 federal appellate · 53 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 102 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 201 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Warren III v. City of Carlsbad · Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. · 506 F. Supp. 554 - Quinto v. Legal Times of Washington, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 571 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“) appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Farmers New World Life Insurance Co. (”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“was being offered for sale, and that he did not see any ads or displays indicating that it was for sale. Nazar never asked Bagdadi any questions about the rights to the video. In a letter following his meeting with Nazar, Bagdadi commented on the display of the video, but he did not protest its use. Nazar states that the video was for sale, but Bagdadi claims that he thought the video was being used for classroom use and he did not recognize it as part of a sales display. 5 In January 1989, Linguex entered into a licensing agreement with Nazar to authorize the reproduction and sale of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bagdadi v. Nazar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.