United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
84 F.3d 1263 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2020
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1654
Relies on Faretta v. California · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Weatherford v. Bursey · In re Disbarment of Adelman · Nunez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“its denial is not amenable to 'harmless error' analysis. The right is either respected or denied; its deprivation cannot be harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“usually increases the likelihood of a trial outcome unfavorable to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.