Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

84 F.3d 1452

Docket No. 95-5079.

James Edward Evanson v. United States of America

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-12-18

Relies on Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley · Walker v. Washington

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-12-18

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: SILBERMAN, SENTELLE, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the motion for summary reversal, it is

¶2

ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion filed February 22, 1995. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

¶3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.

/84/f3d/1452 · .json · Public domain