Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

84 F.3d 1452

Docket No. 92-7209.

Fredericka Farris v. John W. Compton

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-09

Relies on Farris v. Compton · United States v. Johnny J. Moreno

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-09

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: WALD, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon consideration of appellee's motion to govern further proceedings, the opposition thereto, and appellants' motion to reverse, remand and for further proceedings, it is

¶2

ORDERED that appellee's motion to govern further proceedings be denied. It is

¶3

FURTHER ORDERED that appellants' motion to reverse, remand and for further proceedings be granted. The judgment of the district court filed on September 4, 1992, is hereby reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Farris v. Compton, 652 A.2d 49 (D.C.1994).

¶4

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.

/84/f3d/1452 · .json · Public domain