Brooks v. Giuliani’s Empirical Analysis
84 F.3d 1454 · 1996
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Monahan v. New York City Department of Corrections (2000), City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC (2011)
17 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo · Blum v. Yaretsky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an expressed intent to provide assistance, or even a failed initiative to do so” did not establish”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The first four claims raised in plaintiffs’ amended complaint, alleging denial of procedural due process, substantive due process and equal protection, are completely barred by res judicata, because the underlying factual predicate for each of these claims — which concern the TCF reimbursement mechanism, the TCF Statute, the City’s termination of transitional care, and the plaintiffs’ resulting predicament— is substantially identical to the allegations presented in state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[T]he Due Process Clause[ ] generally confer[s] no affirmative right to governmental aid, even where such aid may be necessary to secure life, liberty, or property interests of which the government itself may not deprive the individual.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.