Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 F.3d 532 - Lucas v. Miles

Lucas v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis

84 F.3d 532 · 1996

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Robert Baffa v. Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, Wynder v. McMahon (2004)

20 federal appellate · 5 district ·

4901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman · Owens v. Okure · Branum v. Clark · Romandette v. Weetabix Co. · Minnette v. Warner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[1] the duration of the plaintiff's failures, [2] whether plaintiff had received notice that further delays would result in dismissal, [3] whether the defendant is likely to be prejudiced by further delay, [4] whether the district judge has take[n] care to strik[e] the balance between alleviating court calendar congestion and protecting a party's right to due process and a fair chance to be heard . . . and [5] whether the judge has adequately assessed the efficacy of lesser sanctions.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a decision to dismiss stands a better chance on appeal if the appellate court has the benefit of the district court's reasoning.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “deference is due to the district court's decision to dismiss a pro se litigant's complaint only when the circumstances are sufficiently extreme.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.