Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 F.3d 655 - Yourman v. Dinkins

Yourman v. Dinkins’s Empirical Analysis

84 F.3d 655 · 1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bankston v. Illinois · Atlanta Professional Firefighters Union, Local 134 v. City of Atlanta · Kinney v. District of Columbia · Michigan Ass'n of Governmental Employees v. Michigan Department of Corrections · McDONNELL v. CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “test, as applied, violates the Tenth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act, and also rejected the defense of good faith. Yourman v. Dinkins, 826 F.Supp. 736 (S.D.N.Y.1993). 4 On the employees' cross-appeal, the District Court found in a separate opinion that the employees were not entitled to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “pay reductions based on the City's express policies, and therefore that the City was liable to all employees in that classification, whether or not the policies had actually been applied. Finally, the District Court rejected the City's contention that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “), appeal from the May 12, 1995, judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Judge), granting relief in the form of overtime pay under the FLSA to appellees, 435 of the City's supervisory employees (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.