Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 F.3d 73 - Shann v. Dunk

Shann v. Dunk’s Empirical Analysis

84 F.3d 73 · 1996

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp. (2002), Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd (2002)

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

270199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co. · Pledger v. Medlock · United States v. American College of Physicians

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Type I is where all essential terms have been agreed upon in the preliminary contract, no disputed issues are perceived to remain, and a further contract is envisioned primarily to satisfy formalities. Type II is where the parties recognize the existence of open terms, even major ones, but, having agreed on certain important terms, agree to bind themselves to negotiate in good faith to work out the terms remaining open. In Type II agreements, the parties do not bind themselves to conclude the deal but only to negotiate in good faith toward conclusion within the agreed framework.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[o]rdinarily, preliminary manifestations of assent that require further negotiation and further contracts do not create binding obligations,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The central issue - whether, based on the factual findings, a binding contract existed - is a question of law that we review de novo.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.