Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 F.3d 768 - Degrate v. Godwin

Degrate v. Godwin’s Empirical Analysis

84 F.3d 768 · 1996

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
7
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably McDonald v. Steward (1998), United States v. Taylor (1999)

5 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

130199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bounds v. Smith · Crisp v. Rubin · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann · Robert C. Gilliard, Jr. v. Mississippi · United States v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[H]aving rejected the assistance of court-appointed counsel, Degrate had no constitutional right to access a.law library in preparing the pro se defense of his criminal trial.”); United States v. Sammons, 918 F.2d 592, 602 (6th Cir.1990) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “knowingly and voluntarily waives appointed representation by counsel in a criminal proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.