Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 FSUPP 325 - Alamo Refining Co. v. Shell DevelOpment Co.

Alamo Refining Co. v. Shell DevelOpment Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 1963
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph Corp. · Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc. · Withrow v. Edwards · Treemond Co. v. Schering Corp. · Kohler v. Humphrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * unless Kellogg or Universal were given specific authority to make such threats on behalf of these defendants, there is no justiciable controversy and the complaint should be dismissed. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.