84 F. Supp. 2d 204 - Killela v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Thomas v. Arn · Murray v. Carrier · Rose v. Lundy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all of the time during which a state prisoner is attempting, through proper use of state procedures, to exhaust state court remedies with regard to a particular post-conviction application”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.