84 F. Supp. 2d 315 - Dibble v. Fenimore’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) Whether Plaintiffs Air Guard superiors were hostile toward him because of his past union activities; (2) Whether Plaintiffs Air Guard superiors punished Plaintiff, but not other Air Guard members, for minor transgressions; (3) Whether Plaintiffs Air Guard superiors sought to suspend Plaintiff for purported misconduct that was far less serious than misconduct by other Air Guard members that they ignored; (4) Whether Plaintiffs Air Guard superiors desired to retaliate against Plaintiff because he defeated their attempt to suspend him; and (5) Whether Plaintiffs Air Guard superiors denied Plaintiff reenlistment in the Air Guard, and thus terminated his employment, for pretextual reasons that would apply to many Air Guard members who were not denied reenlistment — pretextual reasons that were “far less significant than misconduct by others” who were not barred from reenlistment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Dibble v. Fenimore