Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Idaho 184 - Angleton v. Angleton

Angleton v. Angleton’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 1996 · most notably Riverside Development Co. v. Ritchie (1982), Rasmussen v. Martin (1983)

56 state decisions

2801962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Forness · Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. New York Central R. · Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. · Western Pac. R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. · Lampe v. Wille

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment; ... if an opinion or memorandum decision is filed, it will be sufficient if the findings of fact and conclusions of law appear therein."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Mitchell v. Flandro
  2. “the judge need only make brief, definite, pertinent findings and conclusions upon the contested matters; there is no necessity for over-elaboration of detail or particularization of facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Matter of X
  3. “Findings should not be discursive; they should not state the evidence or any of the reasoning upon the evidence... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Matter of X

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.