← 84 Ill. App. 3d 495 - People v. Ingram

84 Ill. App. 3d 495 - People v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

cited by 15 later decisions

states following

November 2001

most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2001

15 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 60 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Williams · 44 Ill. App. 3d 459 - People v. Morgan · 14 Ill. App. 3d 378 - People v. Malcom · 38 Ill. App. 3d 435 - People v. Carpenter · 31 Ill. App. 3d 547 - People v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““The court shall not impose consecutive sentences for offenses which were committed as part of a single course of conduct during which there was no substantial change m the nature of the criminal objective, unless, one of the offenses for which defendant was convicted was a Class X or Class 1 felony and the defendant inflicted severe bodily injury, in which event the court may enter sentences to run consecutively.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 108 Ill. App. 3d 665 - People v. Fieberg
“"[t]he test to be used in determining whether a particular offense is part of a single course of conduct, during which there was no substantial change in the nature of the criminal objective, is the independent motivation test; that is, were the defendant’s acts independently motivated?””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 276 Ill. App. 3d 750 - People v. Guzman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.