Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 KAN 137 - State v. Hammon

State v. Hammon’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1988

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

5019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Winters · State v. White · Weeks v. Medler · Wickard v. State · State v. Bowman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The section of the code of criminal procedure quoted is an expression of the sound and sensible rule that error, to be availing, must be injurious in fact as well as in theory. This section has been upon the statute book since 1868 (Gen. Stat. 1868, ch. 82, § 293); and even before that, in 1860, this court, in the case of The Territory v. Reyburn, 1 Kan. [Dassler’s ed.] 551, in the second paragraph of the syllabus said: “ ‘The whole spirit of the civil and criminal codes of practice, alike, is to disregard technicalities and observe the substance only.’ “Without referring to numerous early authorities, it is sufficient to suggest that this doctrine, now, in this state, made almost venerable by time, has in recent as well as in former years been approved and followed by this court. . . .” (pp. 145, 146.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.