Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Mass. App. Ct. 136 - Commonwealth v. Marte

84 Mass. App. Ct. 136 - Commonwealth v. Marte’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Commonwealth v. Lanigan · Commonwealth v. Vasquez · Commonwealth v. Tyree · Commonwealth v. Connolly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a presumptively positive field test, with proper foundation, may be of persuasive weight”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “includes the experience of the officer(s) conducting the test, the methodology of the testing, and definitive identification of the substance, i.e., as cocaine, heroin, or another controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that issue is not present in this appeal, there having been no Lanigan challenge raised below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.