Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 MASSAPPCT 387 - Commonwealth v. Liebenow

Commonwealth v. Liebenow’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morissette v. United States · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Commonwealth v. Pike · Commonwealth v. Sherry · Commonwealth v. Gunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Claim of right. If the defendant took another person’s property in an honest and reasonable belief that (he) (she) (another person on whose behalf he [she] was acting) had a legal right to it, then you must find the defendant not guilty, even if that belief was in fact mistaken, because he [she] lacked the intent to steal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.