¶1This case i¡3 before us on plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment of the St. Louis court of appeals reversing the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, and remanding the cause. The opinion of the court of appeals is reported in 12 Mo. App. 547, where all the questions raised before us in the briefs of counsel are fully considered. We are of the opinion that the conclusion reached is abundantly sustained by the reasons therein given, and deeming it- unnecessary to go over the same ground and repeat here, the judgment is affirmed.
84 Mo. 674
Smith v. Laumier
Decided October 15, 1884
Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1884-10-15
Louis Court of Appeals. (1) The several objections urged by defendant against the tax deed offered in evidence by plaintiff, were well taken, and he was not entitled to recover the possession of the land thereunder. This is conceded. The tax deed, therefore, did not convey the title of the land to plaintiff’s grantor, but only operated to vest in him the tax lien formerly held by the state. State to ios& Rosenblatt v. Herman, 7 Mo. App. Rep., p. 420.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1918
2 state decisions
Relies on Smith v. Laumeier
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1884-10-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →