Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 N.C. App. 644 - Hill v. Perkins

84 N.C. App. 644 - Hill v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. Duke · Smith v. Ford Motor Co. · Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co. · 39 N.C. App. 715 - Fowler v. Williamson · Pharr v. Garibaldi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “alleging sufficient facts from which it may be determined what liability forming conduct is being complained of and what injury plaintiff[] ha[s] suffered.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In order for plaintiffs' complaint to have withstood defendant's motion to dismiss, the complaint must ... provide defendant sufficient notice of the conduct on which the claim is based to enable defendant to respond and prepare for trial[.] ... For the purpose of ruling on a motion to dismiss... conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted. Under the notice theory of pleadings, a statement of claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice of the claim asserted to enable the adverse party to answer and prepare for trial[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`sufficient to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under some legal theory.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.