Searchlight Development, Inc. v. Martello’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. Loucks · Minardi v. Collopy · 72 Cal. App. 18 - Lieberman v. Superior Court · State Ex Rel. Spratley v. Maries County · Flynn v. Janssen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court does not have jurisdiction to appoint a corporate receiver, unless the applicant holder or holders of one-tenth of the issued and outstanding stock has legal title at the time the court considers the application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`the moment when the court is determining whether or not a temporary receiver should be appointed. . . is the controlling time'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny holder or holders of one-tenth of the issued and outstanding stock may apply to the district court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.