Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 N.J. 1 - State v. Sugar

State v. Sugar’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
6
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

1 district · 122 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably State v. Fritz (1987), State v. Marshall (1991)

1 district · 122 state decisions

53019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nly if it is demonstrated that `the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court' will extraneous exposure to the facts of the case not be grounds for automatic disqualification.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has any complexities the untrained defendant is in no position to defend himself * * *.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because the assistance of counsel is essential to insuring fairness and due process in criminal prosecutions, a convicted defendant may not be imprisoned unless counsel was available to him at every”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.