Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 N.J. Super. 577 - Buska v. Aquinaldo

84 N.J. Super. 577 - Buska v. Aquinaldo’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2009

11 state decisions

7019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Carbone · 64 N.J. Super. 156 - Aiello v. Knoll Golf Club · Davis v. . Pearson · United States v. Lueder · Lockard v. Vare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a standard of proof falling somewhere between the ordinary civil and criminal standards.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Lastly, the bill contains in Article IV an amendment to the Dead Man’s Act which eliminates the bar to receiving the testimony but simultaneously establishes a burden of proof to establish the claim by clear and convincing proof.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““When one party to any civil action is a lunatic suing or defending by guardian or when one party sues or is sued in a representative capacity, no other party thereto may testify as to any transaction with or statement by the lunatic while of sound mind or with or by the decedent, unless: a. The guardian of the lunatic or the representative of the decedent offers himself as a witness on his own behalf, and testifies to any transaction with or statement by his testator, intestate or ward, in which event the other party may be a witness on his own behalf as to all transactions with or statements by the lunatic while of sound mind or by the decedent, which are pertinent to the issue; or, * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.