State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably State v. JAVIER M. (2001), State v. Luna (1980)
2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jenkins v. United States · State v. Roy · Blunt v. United States · State v. Padilla
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is quite evident here that appellant had neither been placed under arrest nor in any way detained when he volunteered the statement. Rather, it was made in answer to a question concerning what occurred and can be described as an answer to a general question of a person who knew something of what transpired as a part of the factfinding process, held not to be prohibited in Miranda v. State of Arizona, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swise“You must not concern yourself with the consequences of your verdict. If you should find the Defendant not guilty by reason of insanity, further proceedings in the case will be handled by the Judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lujan v. Tansy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.