Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 N.M. 679 - Jamison v. State Racing Commission

Jamison v. State Racing Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
6
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2006

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

901973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Stevenson · 31 Cal. 2d 401 - Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board · 133 W. Va. 179 - State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing Commission · Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board · Patterson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““15.04 A clear test is required of all horses tested in accordance with these Rules. “(a) Should the chemical, or other analysis, made by the Official State Chemist, or any chemist approved by the Commission, of a urine, saliva or blood sample, or other tests, taken from a horse entered in a race, prove positive, showing presence of any narcotic, stimulant, depressant, local anesthetic, analgesic, pyrasolodine or any derivative or compound thereof, any other drug, chemical or medicine; the Official State Chemist shall so report in the manner prescribed by the Commission. “(d) The Trainer and horses owned or trained by him shall be suspended by the Stewards whose jurisdiction shall not terminate until official laboratory test reports of all races of the Meeting have been received, and the matter shall be referred to the Commission. (g) The Owner, Trainer, foreman in charge of the horse, the groom, and any other person shown to have had care, or attendance, of the horse, may at the discretion of the Commission have any or all of the following penalties inflicted; be suspended, fined or ruled off. “15.06 The Trainer shall be responsible for the condition of the horse he enters.” 507 P.2d at 427 — 428.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.