Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 N.M. 683 - Aboud v. Adams

Aboud v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
7
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson (1999), Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners (1984)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 50 state decisions

340197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors Company · Cave v. Cave · Bank of New Mexico v. Rice · Tome Land & Improvement Co. v. Silva · Gregg v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he loss of the bargain rule was not properly applied as there was no finding made of the market value of the land in question at the time of the breach. The trial court simply took the difference between “what the Adams had agreed to pay and what he later sold [the property] for[.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While a subsequent sale is evidence of the market value at the time of breach, it is not conclusive and the court must properly establish the market value at such time. Thus, evidence of the resale price is properly admitted as one of the factors in determining market value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““[I]n this country in the case of a private sale of land, the right of the vendor to resell on account of the [purchaser’s default] and recover any deficiency arising on the resale is generally denied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.