Kassel v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2021
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lindsey v. Normet · Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of Brock · Whiteman v. Pitrie · Southern Union Gas Co. v. Briner Rust Proofing Co. · Martin v. Board of Education of City of Albuquerque
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appeal concerns unlawful detainer. Sections 36-12-1 through 36-12-4, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2nd Repl. Vol. 6)... . . . . . . The action for unlawful detainer is purely statutory and is restricted in its operation to the situations specified in the statute. Henderson v. Gibbany, 76 N.M. 674 , 417 P.2d 807 (1966). The relief available is possession of the premises and damages. Section 36-12-3, supra. . . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ott v. Keller“The fact that affirmative defenses have been pleaded is no more than a bare contention that factual issues exist concerning those defenses. Such a bare contention is insufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.