84 Ohio App. 3d 214 - State v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of Dayton v. Adams · 21 Ohio App. 3d 75 - City of Columbus v. Murchison · 13 Ohio App. 3d 371 - State v. Huxtable
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) 'Vehicle' means every device, including a motorized bicycle, in, upon, or by which any person or property may be transported or drawn upon a highway *** [with certain exceptions which are not relevant to this case].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Heins · State v. Heins“Besides requiring a police vehicle to be distinctively marked or of a distinctive color, the statute also requires at least one flashing, oscillating or rotating colored light mounted outside on top of the vehicle. It would not make sense to make such a requirement of an aircraft. Even if an aircraft should mount such a light, there is no way anyone on the ground could see it during the daylight hours. The same would apply if the aircraft had been marked. A person who is driving on a highway has an obligation to keep his or her eyes on the roadway, the traffic, pedestrians, and the surroundings, but certainly not on the sky in search of flying aircraft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Heins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.