Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Ohio App. 3d 335 - In Re Kinross

84 Ohio App. 3d 335 - In Re Kinross’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2018

15 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Guardianship of Jadwisiak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A probate court, in order to maintain control over any personal injury settlement entered into on behalf of a ward under its protection, has subject matter jurisdiction over the entire amount of settlement funds, which includes attorney fees to be drawn therefrom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.