84 Ohio App. 3d 502 - McLaughlin v. Beeghly’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2022
4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc. · United States v. Byrum · Crosby v. Beam · 17 Ohio App. 3d 245 - Apicella v. Paf Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a controlling shareholder exercises that control to derive a personal benefit not available to those shareholders out of power, the controlling shareholder has breached his heightened fiduciary duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o all intents and purposes, [he] controlled the voting power of [that other shareholder] as fully as if he actually owned those shares.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“control over the corporation to an extent that [the shareholder's] actions dominate[ ],”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vontz v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.