Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Ohio App. 3d 569 - State v. Briscoe

84 Ohio App. 3d 569 - State v. Briscoe’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · State v. Deem · State v. Curry · 23 Ohio App. 3d 10 - State v. Mattison · 13 Ohio App. 3d 27 - State v. Geraldo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court on motion of a defendant or on its own motion, after the evidence on either side is closed, shall order the entry of a judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in the indictment, information, or complaint, if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of such offense or offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “change * * * the name or identity of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.