84 Ohio App. 3d 89 - In Re Hinko’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2019
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Castle v. Castle · 28 Ohio App. 2d 43 - Hlavin v. W. E. Plechaty Co. · 42 Ohio App. 3d 132 - Hermann, Cahn & Schneider v. Viny · Northern Columbiana County Community Hospital Ass'n v. Department of Youth Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every party shall have the right to be represented by counsel and every child, parent, custodian, or other person in loco parentis the right to appointed counsel if indigent. These rights shall arise when a person becomes a party to a juvenile court proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re C.D.“child's parents or custodian, or any other person in loco parentis of the child is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of the proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re C.D.“after the trial court had reached numerous conclusions about appellants' fitness as parents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re C.D.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.